Recent Human Variation Is Not Evolution

[Law]

Despite the widespread belief that ?we emerged from chimpanzees 6 million years ago,? geneticists observed that differences between people are caused by DNA blocks that are reshuffled in each generation in patterns that remain closely linked.2 This points to a relatively recent development for human variation. Indeed, ?most of the change [happened] from 40,000 years ago to the present.?1


http://www.icr.org/article/4528/

[sniper762]

prehistoric, preadamic, evolved from ape MAN, which existed millions of years ago IS NOT the same as god's CREATED IN HIS IMAGE, ADAM

modern man is a decsendant of adam, made by god approximately 6000 years ago (actually noah and his sons).

yet both evolved man AND adam DID exist

[Fat]

prehistoric, preadamic, evolved from ape MAN, which existed millions of years ago IS NOT the same as god's CREATED IN HIS IMAGE, ADAM

modern man is a decsendant of adam, made by god approximately 6000 years ago (actually noah and his sons).

yet both evolved man AND adam DID exist

Do you believe that there was life on earth thousands of years before Adan? That is what I think you are saying, correct?

[sniper762]

you are absolutely correct in your assumption.

[Fat]

you are absolutely correct in your assumption.

Interesting. Do you believe that there was death on earth before Adam was created?

[sniper762]

SURE THERE WAS  as in the animal kingdom, "only the strong survive".  there were carnivor dinosaurs that killed weaker animals and ate them.  if neanderthal man wanted something from another, he would try to take it, even if it required killing.

[Fat]

SURE THERE WAS  as in the animal kingdom, "only the strong survive".  there were carnivor dinosaurs that killed weaker animals and ate them.  if neanderthal man wanted something from another, he would try to take it, even if it required killing.

Well, if they did it wasn't because of necessity.

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.  And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, where-in there is life, I have given every green herb for meat; and it was so."

Do you believe that Adam would have not have died if he did not eat from the forbidden tree?

[sniper762]

you are confusing the issues.  you only recognize from adam forward.  adam was the first man in "this new world age"

the human beings that  we are talking about were the ones that existed long before him, on an earth that had existed before god formed it from its watery state.

one cannot ignore the scientific and geological past.  it has to fit in somehow.

the biblical story of god's formation (creation as its been worded) of the earth that WE know may not be whole story.

[Fat]

you are confusing the issues.  you only recognize from adam forward.  adam was the first man in "this new world age"

the human beings that  we are talking about were the ones that existed long before him, on an earth that had existed before god formed it from its watery state.

one cannot ignore the scientific and geological past.  it has to fit in somehow.

the biblical story of god's formation (creation as its been worded) of the earth that WE know may not be whole story.

No, I hear what you are saying about a pre-Adam world, I just ask about your belief, Do you believe that Adam would have not have died if he did not eat from the forbidden tree?

[sniper762]

no, he wouldnt have, but i believe that god new that he would.  it all worked according to god's plan.

if he could have eaten from the other tree, "the tree of life" also, then he wouldnt have died either.

[Fat]

sniper762

no, he wouldnt have, but i believe that god new that he would.  it all worked according to god's plan.

if he could have eaten from the other tree, "the tree of life" also, then he wouldnt have died either.

I agree that God knew man would break His one law even before He created the earth.

Science tells us that man and dinosaurs never walked the earth together, do you go along with that?

[sniper762]

YES I DO

therefore, unlike young earthers, i understand that dinosaures could not have existed since god's introduction of adam

[Fat]

YES I DO

therefore, unlike young earthers, i understand that dinosaures could not have existed since god's introduction of adam

Sniper, the trouble here is that the word dinosaur didn't become a word until the 1840s. Before then dinosaurs, meaning terrible lizards, were called Dragons. Now if you run a word search in the King James Bible for dragon or dragons you'll find the word 34 times. It is 10 books, 9 of them in the Old Testament and the book of revelations (used as a metaphor) in the New Testament. Another interesting thing about dinosaurs you see them depicted on drawings and pottery on some of our oldest artifacts. We find these artifacts all over the world and they all seem to be representing the same animals. So how could this be, how could all these people come up with these images of dinosaurs if man was not here to see them. Science tells us that the dinosaurs went extinct 62 million years before the first man. This means that only bones and very weathered bones could have been used to create these images. You also have the Behemoth (Job 40) and Leviathan (Job 41).


Micah 1:8 KJV
Therefore I will wail and howl , I will go stripped and naked: I will make a wailing like the dragons, and mourning as the owls .